Fixed-Scope vs. Iterative Development for App Development Projects

Fixed-Scope vs. Iterative Development for App Development Projects

app development projects can take many forms, but two of the most common approaches are fixed-scope and iterative development. Fixed-scope projects aim to deliver a defined set of features within a specified timeframe, while iterative projects involve frequent releases of working app that evolve over time based on user feedback and business priorities. Both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, and choosing the right one for a given project can be a challenge. In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of building fixed-scope projects versus undertaking iterative development, and consider which one is better suited to different scenarios.

Fixed-scope approach

Fixed-scope projects are often favored by clients who want a clear idea of what they’re getting for their investment, and by teams who prefer to work toward a well-defined goal. By setting specific requirements and deadlines up front, the team can focus on meeting those targets and avoid the risk of scope creep or feature bloat. However, fixed-scope projects can be challenging to deliver on time and within budget, as unforeseen challenges or changes in requirements can cause delays or require additional resources. Additionally, the need to define all requirements up front can limit the ability of the team to adjust to changing needs or new opportunities as the project progresses.

One of the major challenges of fixed-scope projects is the risk of scope creep. Scope creep refers to the gradual expansion of a project’s requirements beyond the original scope, often caused by changes in stakeholder expectations or unforeseen issues that emerge during development. This can be a significant problem in fixed-scope projects, where the team is working toward a specific set of deliverables within a given time frame. Scope creep can cause delays, increase costs, and reduce overall quality. Managing scope creep requires careful communication and stakeholder management throughout the project, as well as a robust change management process to assess the impact of any changes on the project’s goals and timeline. All of these efforts take time and resources away from the actual development efforts.

Iterative development approach

Iterative development, on the other hand, is an approach that favors flexibility and frequent feedback over a fixed set of requirements. In an iterative development project, the team works in short cycles, delivering working app frequently and incorporating user feedback into each release. This approach has several benefits, including increased collaboration between developers and stakeholders, the ability to adapt to changing needs and priorities, and a focus on delivering value early and often. By breaking the project down into small, manageable pieces, the team can identify and address issues early on, reducing the risk of costly delays or failures. Iterative development can also help to mitigate scope creep, as stakeholders have the opportunity to provide feedback and adjust requirements throughout the project’s lifecycle.

One potential challenge of iterative development projects is the need for the client to trust that the team is working at their maximum capacity and delivering as much sprint velocity as possible. In an iterative development project, the team delivers working app in short cycles, with each cycle building on the last. This approach can result in variable delivery speed from sprint to sprint, depending on factors such as the complexity of the features being built and the capacity of the team. This can create uncertainty for the client, who may be used to a more fixed timeline or cost estimate. However, by delivering value early and often, the team can build trust with the client and demonstrate progress throughout the project’s lifecycle. Additionally, by incorporating regular feedback from the client, the team can ensure that the product is meeting the client’s needs and that the project is on track to deliver the desired outcomes. Ultimately, while the variability of sprint velocity can be a challenge in an iterative development project, it can also lead to a more collaborative and transparent development process that is better aligned with the needs of the client.

Our suggestion

Given the current landscape of app development, an iterative development approach is becoming increasingly popular and for good reasons. Firstly, trying to define all requirements of a app development project up-front is nearly impossible, making scope creep inevitable and ultimately leading to more delays and additional expenses. Secondly, technology is advancing at a fast pace, and clients require app solutions that keep up with these changes. An iterative approach enables teams to ship app quickly and incorporate user feedback to improve over time. Finally, it’s often challenging to remain within budget on a fixed-scope project, since the estimation of app development is inherently unpredictable. Iterative development allows teams to work more efficiently, respond more readily to feedback, and ultimately build better app solutions. In conclusion, for these key reasons, we recommend an iterative approach for most app development projects.

Need to build an enterprise grade product?

We replace old enterprise implementations with the latest technology, custom built for better scale, security, usability and value.

Looking for app development services,
advices & best practices?
Contact us

Email us: [email protected]